‘Group 39’ are the infamous group of four computing student misfits that attended the BA Interactive Media degree course at the University of Sunderland from 1996 – 2000. The group, with their own unique set of special skills, put to shame the other students of the course, and sometimes, if not always, the whole of the School of Computing of that year as well. So what’s the story?
In 1997, four students came together to do a presentation project for the Software Engineering module (COM 263) on the topic of the ‘Millennium Bug’. They were Graham Mitchell, Jamie Dearnley, Andrew Smyth and myself. The project was of such high standard that we, students of Interactive Media (50% computing, 50% graphic design) came top. That’s right. We, multimedia designers beat the pure computing students at their own game. But how? Was it the content? Doubtful because each presentation had more or less had the same content as everybody else. No, we delivered our presentation with style!
So what did we do that was so different from the rest of the year? Did we do our presentation on a whiteboard? No. Did we do our presentation on an overhead projector? Be serious. We did ours via a computer. Using the latest and greatest in technology at the time, we delivered our presentation using Macromedia Director. Because our presentation had style and impact, we came top. We had it all, graphics, audio and movies. We even had a working computer program within our presentation to illustrate the Millennium Bug in action. But being Interactive Media students, we *had* to deliver our presentation using a computer right? But the ironic thing is, we were the only computing group that did!
Our presentation was so good, we were asked by our module leader to redo the presentation in the main lecture theatre in front of all the computing students of that year. We sadly declined, but deep down I regret that we didn’t do it. From that day, us four worked together on other projects for the rest of the course, and as we were group 39 on the presentation list, the name (or brand) stuck.
A Shot in the Dark was the assignment for a module on the second year of the Interactive Media course; COM 267 I think, I may be wrong. Anyway, the assignment was to produce a multimedia application that incorporated QuickTime video elements.
Pre-production and research
I don’t know who came up with the original idea or concept because the other lads approached me with the idea whilst I was having lunch, but from that hour’s discussion at the dinner table, we fleshed out the main ideas for the project. We would design an interactive murder “who done it” computer game. The idea was simple. The user would watch and listen to various clues on who may or may not of committed the murder of John Doe (our victim within the game).
For any story, we needed a script, that task was left up to me. From the ideas that were fleshed around, I began writing a script and creating primitive storyboards. I think that the task was left to me because I watched a lot more films than the other lads. Also, Graham found this perfect video clip murder scene from the film The Maltese Falcon which we could use to our advantage. Once the script was complete, we would discussed what was good and what was bad with the plot, but the main story theme was there. As there were four of us, we decided that we would be the main four characters and we would all be the suspects within the game.
When I wrote the plot, I basically took ideas and characters names from other films, I simply didn’t have the time to write an original screenplay! Once done, we all sat down together and watched the films that I took the ideas from. This gave the guys an understanding on what sort of character they were meant to be playing. The main four films that we plagiarised were:
Time was tight on this project, 12 weeks from start to finish, so we couldn’t spend too much time working on the script. It was decided that the main plot, theme of the story and key points were there and the script would be finalised more or less on the day of the actual filming of a particular scene. Once the main plot and theme was decided, we had to discuss the technical specifications of the game. We had to present this project to a judging panel for marking, as well as actually submitting the project to the judges, so it was decided that we would do the project to fit on a standard CD-ROM. This gave us a lot of freedom because we could have our video slightly bigger in size than normal (you can fit a lot of floppy disks on a CD).
We had various discussions on the technical format of the video, and as I was a bit more of an expert in this field than the other guys, I suggested the main format for the video. I suggested that we shot the video in widescreen (16:9) because the look was more professional than 4:3, we were shooting a film, not TV right?. Because the video was going to be shot in colour, I also suggested that we convert the video to grayscale because i) this would reduced the file size of the final file dramatically, and ii) I think the real reason was that the scenes would look similar in style of The Maltese Falcon. The Maltese Falcon was shot in black and white, so we had to be consistent. This worked for us on so many levels. One, it reduced the file size by a factor of 3, two, because the screenplay was set in the 1930 era, black and white film was the norm and three, because we were students, we couldn’t afford proper costumes for the era. For the costumes we only had to find clothing than was similar in style of the 1930’s whereas colour was irrelevant. This also help us for the “blue-screen” chromo effects that we were about to do as well.
Half way through the schedule, we decided that we would included an action sequence. I think that we added it because we were bored and also it would add some excitement to the content of the game. We had so much fun doing this sequence, it was “…a laugh a minute”.
Once the first few scenes were shot, we got busy capturing the content into the computer. James, Andrew and myself were very lucky having the talents of Graham. Graham is a Jedi Master at illustration and whilst we were home a sleep one night, Graham was busy drawing, stylising the main interface for our game. We were also lucky because Graham had his own DV video camera, which we used a lot instead of the cameras supplied by the University. Unfortunately the cameras at Uni were in short supply and you couldn’t have them more than a few days at a time.
We decided, for consistency, that we would use Graham’s camera full time. Graham also had a new Mac 8600 that had a video capture card, so again, we did not have to use the Uni equipment. Back then, the Uni was very under equipped I am sorry to say. I too had recently just bought a Mac Performa and I splashed out another £100 for a video capture card, so we had two. Although my machine was not fast enough to capture the type of content that we wanted, it was good enough to get snippets of sounds, frames of video etc.
Once we got the shots into the computer, we had the task of editing, ‘blue screening’ and compressing. This took hours! We also had to do all the graphics, the last minute video shots of ideas that we came up with to get the project done.
This project went to the wire, and I do mean *the wire*. All of us didn’t get much sleep in the last week of the project and we all walked in the lecture theatre half dead and with beards; the CD itself was still warm from the burner. In the end, we were pulling 20 hour days and Graham’s home studio had 4 Macs in it, all doing graphic work in one form or another. Graham and Andrew were busy making sure that the Director lingo was working correctly, Jamie was busy cleaning up the special effects, and I was busy doing the packaging.
After the presentation, we got our grade. We got top marks, 16/16. The module leader claimed he couldn’t give it anything less. We also showed to the other students of the course what we were made of. As we were the first students to do this module, the finished project was shown to the subsequent years, our project had set the standard.
Due to the size of the whole project, I am unable to put it on the web. Also, the Director projector is MacOS Classic only.
All illustrations were created by Graham Mitchell, except the Clue cards which were created by Andrew Smyth.
- The guns used in the Warehouse scene were normal Cap guns from the toy shop. We must of gone through about 500 rounds! The sparks and flashes are real, these are not post production special effects.
- Our ‘blue screen’ was actually a white wall. Using the same concept (Chrome Key) we just had to make sure that we didn’t wear anything white. I usually wore a bright orange shirt. Unfortunately, it didn’t quite work with some scenes, especially if there was glass involved.
- The original idea was to have the user ask a given suspect 2 of the 4 possible questions that were available. But once we realised how much work was involved, this idea was quickly dropped because of time. This is why only the Doyle suspect has multiple questions and the other suspects are just a look and listen affair.
- The whole project filled Graham’s hard disk, which was 6GB at the time, this was unheard of! Sometimes, Graham had to move the content on to CD to free up space!
- Software used on this project was: PhotoShop 4, Director 6, FreeHand 7 and Premiere 4.2. All running on the Mac, using MacOS 7.5.5. MacOS 8 came out during the project, but we couldn’t run the risk of upgrading until we finished the project.
- Graham stayed up for over 24 hours on the last day. The rest of us got about 4 hours kip.
- Some of the sequences in the Warehouse scene were actually our prototype dalies that we shot in the local community hall.
- The Warehouse scene was heavily influence by the film Hard Boiled, directed by John Woo.
- The script was changing every minute, so the in-joke was “On The Fly Productions presents…”
- So much coffee, tea and coke-cola was consumed, we were actually sweating caffeine.
- The boxes in the Warehouse scene were from the local Co-Op supermarket. The scene was filmed in Graham’s living room. The boxes you actual see in the footage, is what we had. We just stacked them so that they filled the screen. If you were to pan the camera 5 degrees to the left or right, you would had saw the contents of the living room.
- Behind the boxes in the Warehouse scene was in fact the living room window. God knows what the neighbours were thinking…
This project was completed between March – May 1998.